* Login   * Register
It is currently Fri Apr 18, 2014 12:43 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics



All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic


 Post subject: New Form of Boycotting
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:47 am 
Offline
New Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 10:58 am
Posts: 14
Anti-boycott.
Here is an idea, i just thought of after watching 60 minutes. I've always disagreed with the effectiveness of protest and boycotts because they are more symbolic than anything. You never hit these corporations where it counts (their Pockets) for them to even consider implementing change. This is just an idea so i need feed back on whether this is feasible or an attainable plan.

Google makes money by corporations buying add space on the right side of their page. It's an industry that can make lots of money from a customer over a long period of time — making it not unwise to pay $27 per click (to google), even if only one out of 50 of those who click on the ad actually signs up for the service.

Let's use this against them the next time we want protest something. Imagine 1,000 people targeting a single corporation by clicking on a google advertisement like VERIZON, as many times as we can in a one day period. All we do is simply click from the comforts of our home and don't buy. Think about how much money they would lose at $27 dollars per click. One person could click away thousands of dollars from VERIZON for example. It would transfer wealth to google but who cares. Now Thats a boycott. Tell me what you think. Could this work?

http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/07/ ... e-sources/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Form of Boycotting
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:51 pm 
Offline
Nomarch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 7:44 am
Posts: 1372
Location: Denmark
Interesting but doubtfull I would say. Only a select few industries pay $10+ most are a lot lower. Still do the math $27 times 100.000 clicks = $2,7 million = 'a rounding error' for these industries. They have an army of mathematicians to make sure this is actually profitable and I would imagine GoogleAds come with some form of abuse protection.
100.000 clicks is a hell of alot of people... the only way I could see this working would be if 'Anonymous' wrote some code and used a bot... and that would be illegal.

By the way what makes you think the companies you wish to protest are the ones who have expensive CostPerClick? Haliburtons is probably more like $0.50 and what exactly do you have against Verizon?

Thats feasability now should it be done? I say no. What you are proposing is both morally and legally 'stealing'! - I can not approve

_________________
Correct morality can only be derived from what man is — not from what do-gooders and well-meaning aunt Nellies would like him to be

You pilot always into an unknown future; facts are your single clue. Get the facts!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Form of Boycotting
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:15 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:38 pm
Posts: 481
I think i could ,manage 100,000 clicks... :twisted:
http://www.auto-clicker.net/..
a few millions is still orders of magnitude more damage than a few dollars from not buying on of their products.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Form of Boycotting
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:58 am 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Posts: 7342
Fallpr98 wrote:
Anti-boycott.
Here is an idea, i just thought of after watching 60 minutes. I've always disagreed with the effectiveness of protest and boycotts because they are more symbolic than anything. You never hit these corporations where it counts (their Pockets) for them to even consider implementing change. This is just an idea so i need feed back on whether this is feasible or an attainable plan.

Google makes money by corporations buying add space on the right side of their page. It's an industry that can make lots of money from a customer over a long period of time — making it not unwise to pay $27 per click (to google), even if only one out of 50 of those who click on the ad actually signs up for the service.

Let's use this against them the next time we want protest something. Imagine 1,000 people targeting a single corporation by clicking on a google advertisement like VERIZON, as many times as we can in a one day period. All we do is simply click from the comforts of our home and don't buy. Think about how much money they would lose at $27 dollars per click. One person could click away thousands of dollars from VERIZON for example. It would transfer wealth to google but who cares. Now Thats a boycott. Tell me what you think. Could this work?

http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/07/ ... e-sources/

No.

Google has sophisticated algorithms to detect fraudulent clicks. If you sat there clicking from the same IP address all day, they'll stop charging the advertisers.

If your scheme worked, then every company would employ a bunch of clickers to drain their competitors' ad budgets. No company would purchase such advertising if fraud were so simple.

_________________
"Yuck factor aside (along with the potential for the animal to harm the human), if the animal isn't being harmed I'm not sure why bestiality should be a felony." -- drtrech

"Boethius was the only user here to successfully piss me off IRL, and you'll notice it's been crickets from him for a while. I'm not saying he's dead now . . . but . . . :twisted:" -- DBTrek

"How about you just suck on a cyanide lollipop and spare us your fucking hyperbole you whining little nancy?" -- Cid

"If Dan had a lick of sense he'd have booted your pompous ass ages ago." - RAnthony


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Form of Boycotting
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline
Nomarch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 7:44 am
Posts: 1372
Location: Denmark
antisexualist wrote:
a few millions is still orders of magnitude more damage than a few dollars from not buying on of their products.


Pardon me, I simply do not understand this sentence - no idea what is being said

_________________
Correct morality can only be derived from what man is — not from what do-gooders and well-meaning aunt Nellies would like him to be

You pilot always into an unknown future; facts are your single clue. Get the facts!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Form of Boycotting
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:01 pm 
Offline
Nomarch
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:06 am
Posts: 1860
Location: Austin, TX
You seem to suffer from a severe shortage of mushrooms.

Makes perfect sense to me.

_________________
Fugitive from the law of averages


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  


Post new topic Reply to topic

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group


Home l Common Sense l Hardcore History l Donate l Community l Merchandise l Blog l About Us